Which of the following develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court's Plessy v. Ferguson decision?
A. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.
B. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.
C. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
D. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine.
C. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
The correct answer is A. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.
To determine which option develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court's Plessy v. Ferguson decision, we should analyze each option.
A. Option A states that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause. This option does not explicitly connect judicial restraint with the decision and the equal protections clause.
B. Option B argues that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because it challenged the actions of both the legislative and judicial branches. Although this option suggests that judicial restraint played a role in challenging the decision, it does not clearly articulate how judicial restraint supports the decision.
C. Option C asserts that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches. This claim does not establish a direct link between judicial restraint and the decision.
D. Option D contends that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine. This option presents a logical argument by connecting judicial restraint with the outcome of the decision.
Therefore, option D - "Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine" develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court's Plessy v. Ferguson decision.