Which of the following develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court's Plessy v. Ferguson decision?
A. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.
B. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.
C. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
D. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine.
C. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
The correct answer is C. Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
To determine which of the given options develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court's Plessy v. Ferguson decision, we need to examine each option and reason through their claims.
A. Option A suggests that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause. This is not a logical argument about judicial restraint supporting the decision because it only highlights a challenge to legislative intent, without demonstrating how judicial restraint plays a role.
B. Option B states that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because it challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches. This option only suggests that the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches, without explicitly connecting the concept of judicial restraint to the decision.
C. Option C claims that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches. While this option mentions the notion of judicial restraint and its connection to the decision, it does not explain how exactly judicial restraint is embodied in the decision itself.
D. Option D argues that judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine. This option provides a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the decision. By invalidating the separate but equal doctrine, the Supreme Court demonstrated restraint by not overstepping its boundaries and intervening in legislative matters.
Based on the analysis, option D - "Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine" - develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson.
Which of the following best analyzes the ruling Plessy v. Ferguson had on individual freedoms and equal protections?
A. Plessy v. Ferguson established the separate but equal doctrine that segregated Black Americans in public spaces.
B. Plessy v. Ferguson ended segregation between White and Black Americans with the separate but equal doctrine.
C. Plessy v. Ferguson established segregation in public transportation based on the constitutionality of the Louisiana Separate Car Act.
D. Plessy v. Ferguson applied the separate but equal doctrine only to public transportation across the U.S.
The option that best analyzes the ruling Plessy v. Ferguson's impact on individual freedoms and equal protections is C. Plessy v. Ferguson established segregation in public transportation based on the constitutionality of the Louisiana Separate Car Act. This option accurately describes how the ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson upheld the constitutionality of segregation laws, specifically in public transportation, and allowed for the establishment of separate facilities for different racial groups. It highlights the impact of the ruling on individual freedoms by institutionalizing segregation based on race and undermining the principle of equal protections for all individuals.
Which of the following best describes how the Fourteenth Amendment extended and limited civil rights to Black Americans?
A. The Fourteenth Amendment defined citizenship in the U.S., abolished slavery, and guaranteed due process to all citizens; however, it did not extend or prevent the separate but equal doctrine.
B. The Fourteenth Amendment defined citizenship, prevented the separate but equal doctrine, and abolished slavery; however, it did not reverse the Three-Fifths Compromise or extended voting rights to Black Americans.
C. The Fourteenth Amendment defined citizenship in the U.S., made all citizens equal before the law, and guaranteed due process to all citizens; however, it did not extend voting rights to Black Americans or prevent the separate but equal doctrine.
D. The Fourteenth Amendment defined citizenship in the U.S., granted voting rights for Black American men, and guaranteed due process; however, it did not abolish slavery or prevent the separate but equal doctrine.