Which statement best assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the Constitution?(1 point) Responses Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch. Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch. Both cases did not increase any federal power. Both cases did not increase any federal power. Both cases increased the powers of the federal government. Both cases increased the powers of the federal government. Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch.

Question

Which statement best assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the Constitution?(1 point) Responses Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch. Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch. Both cases did not increase any federal power. Both cases did not increase any federal power. Both cases increased the powers of the federal government. Both cases increased the powers of the federal government. Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch.

Answer 1

Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.

Answer 2

The statement that best assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the Constitution is that both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.

Answer 3

The statement that best assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the Constitution is: "Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch."

To understand why this statement is the most accurate assessment, we need to examine the details of these two landmark cases.

Marbury v. Madison (1803) was a Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review. In this case, the Court held that it had the power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. This decision effectively increased the powers of the judicial branch by giving it the authority to interpret and review the constitutionality of laws passed by the other branches of government.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) was another important Supreme Court case that addressed the scope of federal powers. The Court ruled that the federal government had implied powers to create a national bank, even though this power was not explicitly stated in the Constitution. This decision expanded the powers of the federal government, specifically by affirming the doctrine of implied powers.

While it is true that both cases had broader implications and impact beyond solely increasing the powers of the judiciary, the statement "Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch" is the most accurate because both cases directly addressed and legally solidified the authority and influence of the judiciary branch in interpreting and reviewing laws.