Which statement best assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the constitution?
Both cases did not increase any federal power.
Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.
Both cases increased the powers of the federal government.
Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch.
The correct statement that assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the constitution is: Both cases increased the powers of the federal government.
To determine which statement best assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the constitution, we need to understand the outcomes of these cases.
Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to declare laws passed by Congress or actions taken by the Executive Branch unconstitutional. This case significantly increased the powers of the judicial branch by granting them the authority to interpret the Constitution and decide whether laws are in alignment with it.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) dealt with the establishment of a national bank and the state of Maryland's attempt to tax it. The Supreme Court held that Congress had the power to create a national bank using the doctrine of implied powers, as outlined in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. This case increased the powers of the federal government by affirming the principle of implied powers and the supremacy of federal law over state law.
Based on these outcomes, the correct statement that best assesses the impact of both Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the constitution is:
"Both cases increased the powers of the federal government."