Anti-federalists objected to the Necessary and Proper Clause in the Supremacy Clause because they believed it gave the federal government too much power by allowing them to interpret and enforce laws as they saw fit, potentially leading to an abuse of authority and encroachment on individual rights.
The Anti-Federalists objected to the Necessary and Proper Clause in the Supremacy Clause because they believed it would give the federal government too much power, as it allowed Congress to make any laws they deemed necessary and proper for executing their powers.
The Anti-Federalists objected to the Necessary and Proper Clause because they believed it granted too much power to the national government, with the potential to undermine the authority and autonomy of the states as outlined in the Supremacy Clause. To understand their objections in more depth, it would be helpful to study Anti-Federalist writings, such as the essays of Brutus and the Anti-Federalist Papers, which offer detailed arguments against these constitutional provisions.
