Which option best describes the way in which physical geography influenced modern population distribution?(1 point)
Responses
Urbanization has increased population density as people move to cities for jobs.
Urbanization has increased population density as people move to cities for jobs.
Cultural hearths attract a large number of migrants, increasing population density in nearby cities.
Cultural hearths attract a large number of migrants, increasing population density in nearby cities.
Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.
Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.
Most people live in mountainous areas, as techniques were developed to grow food on slopes.
Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.
The option that best describes the way in which physical geography influenced modern population distribution is:
Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.
The option that best describes the way in which physical geography influenced modern population distribution is:
Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.
To arrive at this answer, we can analyze the options provided:
Option 1: Urbanization has increased population density as people move to cities for jobs. This option discusses the influence of urbanization on population density but does not directly address physical geography.
Option 2: Cultural hearths attract a large number of migrants, increasing population density in nearby cities. This option discusses how cultural hearths attract migrants, but again, it does not directly address physical geography.
Option 4: Most people live in mountainous areas, as techniques were developed to grow food on slopes. While this option does mention physical geography (mountainous areas), it does not accurately reflect the distribution of population in modern times.
Option 3: Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture. This option directly addresses physical geography and explains how the climate in midlatitudes is favorable for agriculture. As a result, it has influenced population distribution, as more people choose to live in areas where they can engage in agricultural activities.
Therefore, option 3 is the most accurate and best describes the influence of physical geography on modern population distribution.