which option best describes the way in which physical geography influenced modern population distrubution? ( 1 point )
A.) Cultural hearths attract a large number of migrants, increasing population density in nearby cities.
B.) Most people live in mountainous areas, as techniques were developed to grow food on slopes
C.) Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.
D.) Urbanization has increased population density as people move to the cities for jobs.
To determine which option best describes the way in which physical geography influenced modern population distribution, let's examine each option:
A.) Cultural hearths attract a large number of migrants, increasing population density in nearby cities.
Cultural hearths, which are areas where civilization originated and spread, can indeed attract migrants and increase population density in nearby cities. However, this option does not specifically mention the influence of physical geography on population distribution.
B.) Most people live in mountainous areas, as techniques were developed to grow food on slopes.
This option suggests that most people live in mountainous areas due to the development of techniques to grow food on slopes. While some mountainous regions may have developed such techniques, this statement does not represent a global or widespread phenomenon. Furthermore, it does not explain how physical geography influenced modern population distribution overall.
C.) Most people live in the midlatitudes because the climate is good for agriculture.
This option suggests that most people live in the midlatitudes due to the favorable agricultural climate. The midlatitudes generally refer to regions that are neither too hot nor too cold. This statement acknowledges the influence of physical geography on population distribution by highlighting the role of a favorable climate for agriculture.
D.) Urbanization has increased population density as people move to the cities for jobs.
Urbanization, the process of population concentration in cities, has indeed increased population density in specific areas. While this option does not explicitly mention the influence of physical geography, it does highlight how population distribution has been affected by people migrating to cities for job opportunities.
Upon analyzing the options, option C seems to best describe the way in which physical geography influenced modern population distribution. The presence of a good agricultural climate in the midlatitudes has attracted a significant portion of the global population to these regions.