How did the ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case change law enforcement procedures?(1 point) Responses Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated. Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated. Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant. Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant. Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney. Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney. Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Which statement best identifies how the Second Amendment was interpreted in the McDonald v. Chicago case?(1 point) Responses The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution. The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution. The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution. The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution. The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment. The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment. The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Which statement best assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the Constitution?(1 point) Responses Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch. Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch. Both cases did not increase any federal power. Both cases did not increase any federal power. Both cases increased the powers of the federal government. Both cases increased the powers of the federal government. Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.
Both cases increased the powers of the federal government.
The correct response is:
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
The correct response is: Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
In the case Miranda v. Arizona, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement officers are required to inform suspects of their rights before conducting custodial interrogations. This ruling established what is now known as the Miranda warning or Miranda rights. These rights include the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the warning that anything the suspect says can be used against them in court.
The purpose of this ruling was to protect individuals' Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. It ensures that suspects are aware of their rights and that any statements they make during interrogation are voluntary and not coerced.
As a result of this ruling, law enforcement officers are now required to read suspects their Miranda rights before questioning them while in police custody. Failure to do so can result in the exclusion of any statements made by the suspect during the interrogation from being used as evidence in court. This ruling has significantly influenced and shaped law enforcement procedures to protect the rights of individuals during the criminal justice process.