Which statement best explains the difference between the Mayan civilization and the Roman Republic?(1 point)

Responses

The Mayan civilization featured one major city, similar to Rome, and its rulers were elected annually, while the Roman Republic featured a consul for every city in the republic.
The Mayan civilization featured one major city, similar to Rome, and its rulers were elected annually, while the Roman Republic featured a consul for every city in the republic.

The Roman Republic had three classes of citizens: the elites, plebeians, and patricians. The Mayan civilization only had two: upper class and lower class.
The Roman Republic had three classes of citizens: the elites, plebeians, and patricians. The Mayan civilization only had two: upper class and lower class.

The Roman Republic used a senate and Centuriate Assembly, while the Mayan civilization only used a Tribal Assembly that dealt solely with civilian affairs.
The Roman Republic used a senate and Centuriate Assembly, while the Mayan civilization only used a Tribal Assembly that dealt solely with civilian affairs.

The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate.
The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate.

The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate.

The statement that best explains the difference between the Mayan civilization and the Roman Republic is: "The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate."

The statement that best explains the difference between the Mayan civilization and the Roman Republic is:

"The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate."

To arrive at this answer, we can analyze each response and determine which one presents the most accurate and distinct difference between the Mayan civilization and the Roman Republic.

- Option 1 is not accurate because it states that the Mayan civilization had only one major city, while Rome had one major city and rulers were elected annually. This is incorrect because the Mayan civilization had multiple major cities, not just one.

- Option 2 is not accurate because it states that the Roman Republic had three classes of citizens (elites, plebeians, and patricians), while the Mayan civilization only had two (upper class and lower class). However, both the Roman Republic and the Mayan civilization had different social classes, so this does not provide a distinct difference.

- Option 3 is not accurate because it states that the Roman Republic used a senate and Centuriate Assembly, while the Mayan civilization only used a Tribal Assembly dealing solely with civilian affairs. However, both societies had different political structures, so this does not provide a distinct difference either.

- Option 4 is the most accurate and distinct statement. It states that the Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each city operated independently with its own culture and laws. In contrast, the Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate. This provides a clear difference in terms of leadership structure and political organization.

Therefore, the correct answer is "The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate."