How did the ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case change law enforcement procedures?(1 point) Responses Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated. Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated. Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights. Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights. Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney. Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney. Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant.
The correct response is: Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Which statement best identifies how the Second Amendment was interpreted in the McDonald v. Chicago case?(1 point) Responses The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution. The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution. The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution. The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution. The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment.
The correct response is: The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Which statement best assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the Constitution?(1 point) Responses Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch. Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch. Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch. Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch. Both cases did not increase any federal power. Both cases did not increase any federal power. Both cases increased the powers of the federal government.
The correct response is: Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.
The correct response is:
1. Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
The correct answer is:
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Explanation:
The ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case changed law enforcement procedures by establishing that before law enforcement officials can interrogate a suspect who is in custody, they must first inform the suspect of their Miranda rights, which include the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present during questioning. This ruling ensures that individuals are aware of their rights and are protected from self-incrimination during police interrogations. Therefore, the correct response is that law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.