Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic?(1 point)

Question

Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic?(1 point)

Responses

A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier.
A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier.

A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens.
A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens.

A single large republic will make controlling factions easier.
A single large republic will make controlling factions easier.

A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states.

Answer 1

A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens.

Answer 2

The best summary of the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic is that it will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens.

Answer 3

The logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic is that it will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens. They believed that in a large republic, the government would become distant from the people, making it challenging for individual citizens to have their voices heard and their interests represented. This is because the representatives elected to govern a large republic would have less knowledge of and connection to the local concerns and needs of the people. Consequently, the Anti-Federalists asserted that a smaller, more localized form of government would be better suited to representing and protecting the interests of the citizens. To summarize, the Anti-Federalists argued that a single large republic would make it difficult to accurately represent the views of the citizens.