Determine which of the following statements is a valid example of paternalism.(1 point) Responses The British East India Company made trade agreements with the Mughal Empire. The British East India Company made trade agreements with the Mughal Empire. The U.S. won the Spanish-American War and claimed territories, such as Guam and Puerto Rico. The U.S. won the Spanish-American War and claimed territories, such as Guam and Puerto Rico. The British government only allowed British officials, not trained Indians, to hold positions in government. The British government only allowed British officials, not trained Indians, to hold positions in government. The British government allowed indirect rule of Nigeria by letting local leaders have more control.
The British government only allowed British officials, not trained Indians, to hold positions in government.
Which of the following best assesses the impact of colonization on religion in Africa?(1 point) Responses Colonial powers forced Africans to convert to Christianity and destroyed traditional temples and other religious sites. Colonial powers forced Africans to convert to Christianity and destroyed traditional temples and other religious sites. Missionaries converted many Africans to Christianity, and eventually Africans took charge of the churches in Africa. Missionaries converted many Africans to Christianity, and eventually Africans took charge of the churches in Africa. Colonial powers used Christianity to control Africans, and they tightly controlled Christian churches. Colonial powers used Christianity to control Africans, and they tightly controlled Christian churches. Many Africans converted to Islam to show their opposition to their Christian colonizers.
Missionaries converted many Africans to Christianity, and eventually Africans took charge of the churches in Africa.
The statement that is a valid example of paternalism is: "The British government only allowed British officials, not trained Indians, to hold positions in government."
To determine which of the statements is a valid example of paternalism, it is important to understand the concept of paternalism. Paternalism refers to a system or practice in which a governing authority or dominant group makes decisions for a subordinate group, believing that they are acting in the best interests of that group.
Now, let's look at each statement and assess if it aligns with the concept of paternalism:
1. "The British East India Company made trade agreements with the Mughal Empire."
- This statement does not directly demonstrate paternalism as it only mentions trade agreements between the British East India Company and the Mughal Empire. It does not indicate that the British East India Company was making decisions on behalf of the Mughal Empire. Therefore, this statement is not an example of paternalism.
2. "The U.S. won the Spanish-American War and claimed territories, such as Guam and Puerto Rico."
- Again, this statement does not explicitly describe paternalism. It mentions a military victory by the United States and its subsequent claiming of territories. While this may involve dominance or control, it does not illustrate the concept of paternalism where decisions are made in the interests of a subordinate group. Therefore, this statement is not an example of paternalism.
3. "The British government only allowed British officials, not trained Indians, to hold positions in government."
- This statement describes a policy implemented by the British government in regards to government positions in India. Here, the British authority is making a decision about who can hold positions in government, excluding trained Indians. This demonstrates an example of paternalism as the British government is assuming that only British officials are qualified or superior enough to hold government positions. Therefore, this statement is an example of paternalism.
4. "The British government allowed indirect rule of Nigeria by letting local leaders have more control."
- This statement describes a policy implemented by the British government in Nigeria. Instead of direct rule, the British government allowed local leaders to have more control over the region. While this may indicate a form of colonial control, it does not align with the concept of paternalism as the British government is not making decisions on behalf of the locals but rather allowing them some autonomy. Therefore, this statement is not an example of paternalism.
Based on the analysis above, the statement that represents a valid example of paternalism is: "The British government only allowed British officials, not trained Indians, to hold positions in government."