Which of the following statements constructs a logical argument supporting the assertion that India was the
"jewel in the crown" of the British Empire? (1 point)
• The British Empire destroyed the Indian economy to prevent competition with Western powers.
• The British Empire promoted the speaking of English, making india the second largest English-speaking nation in
• The British Empire conquered India and ended the Mughal Dynasty's control over the region.
The British Empire developed multiple ways to extract wealth from India, including trade goods, monopolies, and taxation.
Well, if we're trying to construct a logical argument supporting the assertion that India was the "jewel in the crown" of the British Empire, let's dive into these statements:
Statement 1: The British Empire destroyed the Indian economy to prevent competition with Western powers. Well, if you think about it, destroying someone's economy doesn't really make them a valuable jewel, does it? It's more like breaking a precious gem and saying, "Look how awesome this is!" So, this statement doesn't quite support the argument.
Statement 2: The British Empire promoted the speaking of English, making India the second largest English-speaking nation. Now, this statement has some weight to it. If India became a major English-speaking nation, it could have opened up opportunities for trade, cultural exchange, and perhaps even adoption of British ideals and governance. So, we can give this statement a point.
Statement 3: The British Empire conquered India and ended the Mughal Dynasty's control over the region. Hm, well, conquering a place usually means you want to have control and gain resources. So, this statement does support the idea that India had some significance to the British Empire's power.
Statement 4: The British Empire developed multiple ways to extract wealth from India, including trade goods, monopolies, and taxation. While extracting wealth sounds more like a greedy treasure hunter than a "jewel in the crown," it does show that India had valuable resources that the British Empire wanted. So, we can add this statement to the argument.
So, after examining these statements, it seems that the second and fourth statements provide a logical basis for supporting the assertion that India was the "jewel in the crown" of the British Empire.
The statement "The British Empire developed multiple ways to extract wealth from India, including trade goods, monopolies, and taxation" constructs a logical argument supporting the assertion that India was the "jewel in the crown" of the British Empire. This implies that the British Empire saw significant value in India and sought to exploit its resources and wealth.
To construct a logical argument supporting the assertion that India was the "jewel in the crown" of the British Empire, we can gather evidence from the given statements:
1. The British Empire destroyed the Indian economy to prevent competition with Western powers.
This statement suggests that the British Empire took measures to limit India's economic growth in order to protect its own economic dominance. If true, it implies that India held significant economic value for the British Empire.
2. The British Empire promoted the speaking of English, making India the second largest English-speaking nation.
This statement indicates that the British Empire made efforts to spread the English language in India. If India became the second largest English-speaking nation, it suggests that it held cultural and linguistic importance for the British Empire.
3. The British Empire conquered India and ended the Mughal Dynasty's control over the region.
This statement highlights the British Empire's conquest of India, overthrowing the Mughal Dynasty and gaining control over the region. This implies that India was a valuable acquisition for the British Empire.
4. The British Empire developed multiple ways to extract wealth from India, including trade goods, monopolies, and taxation.
This statement highlights the various methods employed by the British Empire to extract wealth from India. If the British Empire had multiple mechanisms in place to generate wealth from India, it further supports the notion that India held significant economic value.
By combining these statements, we can form a logical argument supporting the assertion that India was the "jewel in the crown" of the British Empire:
The British Empire had a vested interest in India due to its economic value. They undertook measures to limit India's economic growth, promoted the English language and culture in India, conquered the region, and developed several ways to extract wealth from it. These actions suggest that India held significant importance within the British Empire, making it the "jewel in the crown."
The statement that constructs a logical argument supporting the assertion that India was the "jewel in the crown" of the British Empire is:
• The British Empire developed multiple ways to extract wealth from India, including trade goods, monopolies, and taxation.
To demonstrate why this statement supports the assertion, we can break down the statement into its components:
1. The British Empire developed multiple ways to extract wealth from India: This suggests that the British Empire had a vested economic interest in India and took active measures to exploit its resources.
2. Including trade goods, monopolies, and taxation: By engaging in trade with India, establishing monopolies, and imposing taxes, the British Empire was able to control and profit from various aspects of India's economy, reinforcing the idea that India held significant value for the empire.
This statement provides evidence of the British Empire's economic exploitation of India, which is a crucial aspect of the argument that India was considered the "jewel in the crown" or the most valued possession of the British Empire.