Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-federalists to argue against a single large republic?
A. A single large will make controlling factions easier.
B. A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states
C. A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens
D. A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier.
C. A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens.
Which of the following represents Madison’s views on factions
A. Factions can best be controlled by having a large republic.
B. Factions can best be controlled by remaining as 13 separate countries.
C. Factions can best be controlled by direct citizen participation in policy making.
D. Factions can best be controlled through direct democracy.
A. Factions can best be controlled by having a large republic.
Which of the following statements best assesses how the U.S. attempts to balance the interests of the majority with the individuals and minority groups?
A. The U.S. allows individuals to express themselves unless their viewpoints are offensive to the majority.
B. Minority groups have been guaranteed equality but are not tolerated when their viewpoints do not match the majority.
C. The U.S. usually allows majority rule but attempts to protect the rights of individuals and minority groups through the judicial and political processes.
D. Individual and minority groups are not guaranteed any rights in the U.S.
C. The U.S. usually allows majority rule but attempts to protect the rights of individuals and minority groups through the judicial and political processes.
C. A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens.
To determine the answer, we need to analyze the logic used by the Anti-federalists to argue against a single large republic. The Anti-federalists were a group of individuals who opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution. They believed that a strong central government would threaten individual liberty and the power of the states.
Option A suggests that a single large republic would make controlling factions easier. This argument aligns with the concerns raised by the Anti-federalists, as they feared that a single large republic would result in a concentration of power, enabling majority factions to dominate and potentially suppress the rights of minority factions. This argument is a strong point made by the Anti-federalists.
Option B argues that a single large republic would best represent and protect the interests of the states. However, this is not aligned with the anti-Federalist perspective, as they were concerned about the power of the central government and believed that a more decentralized system would better protect the rights and interests of the states.
Option C states that a single large republic would make it difficult, if not impossible, to represent the views of the citizens. This argument reflects the concerns of the Anti-federalists, who believed that a representative government would be unresponsive to the needs and interests of the people due to the large geographic size and population of a single republic.
Option D suggests that a single large republic would make direct citizen participation easier. However, this argument does not reflect the concerns raised by the Anti-federalists, who were primarily focused on limiting the powers of the central government and ensuring the protection of individual liberties.
Based on the logic used by the Anti-federalists, the best summary can be found in option C. The Anti-federalists argued that a single large republic would make it difficult, if not impossible, to represent the views of the citizens.