Between about 1700 and 1850, most parts of the world sought to limit contact with Europeans. Looking at the following locations, indicate where in your judgment that policy was most effective…and where it was least effective. Explain your reasoning.
- Ottoman Empire
- India
- China
- Africa
- Japan
- North America
ADD ANSWER
+10 PTS
The policy of limiting contact with Europeans was most effective in Japan and least effective in North America.
Japan, under the rule of the Tokugawa shogunate, implemented a policy of sakoku (closed country) in the 17th century, which restricted trade and contact with Europeans and other foreigners. The policy was highly effective in maintaining Japan's isolation from the outside world until the arrival of American Commodore Matthew Perry in 1853. This allowed Japan to preserve its culture and traditions, leading to a strong sense of national identity and modernization during the Meiji Restoration of the late 19th century.
On the other hand, North America, particularly the United States, was unable to effectively limit contact with Europeans due to colonization, expansion, and trade. European powers established colonies and trading posts throughout the continent, leading to conflicts and the eventual displacement and subjugation of indigenous peoples. Despite efforts to restrict European influence, such as the Proclamation of 1763 and the Indian Removal Act of 1830, European contact significantly impacted the continent's history and development.
In the cases of the Ottoman Empire, India, China, and Africa, the effectiveness of limiting contact with Europeans varied. The Ottoman Empire was able to limit European influence to some extent through diplomatic and military efforts, but ultimately suffered territorial losses and decline. India and China were both subject to European colonization and trade, although both had periods of isolation and resistance. Africa, with its vast and diverse geography, experienced a mix of European colonization, trade, and resistance from different regions and groups.
Between 1700 and 1850, the effectiveness of limiting contact with Europeans varied across different regions. Here's an evaluation of the policy's effectiveness in each location:
1. Ottoman Empire:
- Most Effective: The Ottoman Empire was relatively successful in limiting European influences during this period. The empire's strong central authority and strategic geographical location acted as deterrents for European powers seeking to expand their influence.
- Least Effective: The policy was least effective in regions where European powers, such as France and Britain, were able to establish trading posts and gain economic leverage, such as in Egypt and parts of the Balkans.
2. India:
- Most Effective: India's vast size and diverse geographical features made it difficult for Europeans to establish a strong foothold across the entire subcontinent. The Mughal Empire's rule provided a level of resistance against European encroachments, particularly in its early stages.
- Least Effective: However, the policy was least effective in regions where Europeans established colonial control, such as British East India Company's control over Bengal and other parts of India.
3. China:
- Most Effective: China, under the Qing dynasty, implemented an isolationist policy, which limited European interference to some extent. The Great Wall of China and strict regulations on foreign trade helped preserve China's autonomy during this period.
- Least Effective: The policy was least effective in regions where European powers, especially Britain, forcibly opened up trade ports like Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Guangzhou through military intervention and unequal treaties.
4. Africa:
- Most Effective: Many regions in Africa remained relatively isolated from European contact during this period due to geographical barriers, such as deserts, dense forests, and lack of navigable waterways. Eastern, Central, and Southern Africa maintained limited contact with Europeans.
- Least Effective: The policy was least effective in regions where Europeans established colonies, such as French and British control over West Africa and North Africa, and Portuguese control over parts of Southern Africa.
5. Japan:
- Most Effective: Japan's policy of sakoku, or national seclusion, implemented by the Tokugawa Shogunate, was highly effective in limiting contact with Europeans. They restricted foreign trade and expelled most Europeans, allowing only limited contact with the Dutch through designated port towns.
- Least Effective: This policy was extremely successful, and contact with Europeans became almost entirely restricted until the 1850s when Japan was forcefully opened to trade by the United States.
6. North America:
- Most Effective: The policy was most effective in regions inhabited by Indigenous peoples of North America. European colonial settlements mostly remained along the Atlantic coastline and did not penetrate deep into the interior due to resistance from Native American tribes.
- Least Effective: The policy was least effective in regions where Europeans established colonies and later the United States expanded westward through military conquest and the displacement of Native American tribes.
It is important to note that the effectiveness of limiting contact with Europeans varied within each location and was influenced by factors such as geographical features, political stability, military strength, and the specific actions of European powers.