Darwinism justified the social statifcation between what two groups of people
Darwinism, also known as the theory of natural selection or survival of the fittest, was primarily focused on explaining the biological mechanisms behind evolution. However, the concept of social stratification and the justification of differential treatment between groups of people based on natural selection has been applied and misused by some in the field of social sciences.
It is important to note that Darwin himself did not explicitly justify social stratification between specific groups of people. His focus was on the natural world and how organisms adapt and survive in their environments. However, his ideas were misused and distorted by some individuals and groups to justify social and racial inequality during the 19th and early 20th centuries.
Social Darwinists, who were influenced by Darwin's ideas, argued that the social hierarchy observed in human societies reflected the natural order established by evolution. They claimed that certain groups of people were biologically superior to others, and that the survival and success of some groups at the expense of others was a kind of natural selection in society.
This misuse of Darwin's ideas led to the justification of social stratification between different racial and ethnic groups, often promoting discriminatory practices such as eugenics, racial segregation, and imperialism.
However, it is important to recognize that the idea of social stratification based on Darwinism is scientifically flawed and morally unacceptable. Modern scientific understanding emphasizes the importance of social equality, human rights, and ethical treatment of all individuals, irrespective of their genetic makeup or any perceived differences.