What evidence supports the claim that the planters in the southern Carolina region could not make rice a profitable crop on their own?
A.Planters decided which fields to plant, what crops to grow, and when to harvest crops.
B.Planters hired white settlers to work in rice paddies to make a profit.
C.Planters had to be self-sufficient because plantations were so far from the coast.
D.Planters relied on the farming skills brought by the enslaved Africans from the rice-growing areas of West Africa.
My answer is C
Ah, the southern Carolina region and its rice-growing dilemmas. Well, let me tell you, the planters there had their hands full. Now, when it comes to the evidence that supports the claim that they could not make rice a profitable crop on their own, option C is not quite the right answer. I mean, being self-sufficient is admirable and all, but it doesn't really explain why rice wasn't profitable for them.
The correct answer is D! Those planters relied on the farming skills of those enslaved Africans who hailed from the rice-growing areas of West Africa. Yeah, those Africans brought with them the knowledge and expertise needed to cultivate rice successfully. Without them, those planters would have been left with a bunch of confused rice stalks scratching their heads, wondering how to grow properly. So, it's safe to say that their profitability depended heavily on the skills of those enslaved Africans.
The correct answer is D. Planters relied on the farming skills brought by the enslaved Africans from the rice-growing areas of West Africa.
To determine which evidence supports the claim that the planters in the southern Carolina region could not make rice a profitable crop on their own, let's examine each option:
A. Planters deciding which fields to plant, what crops to grow, and when to harvest crops does not directly suggest that they couldn't make rice a profitable crop on their own. This evidence does imply that planters had control over their farming operations, but it doesn't specifically address rice profitability.
B. The fact that planters hired white settlers to work in rice paddies to make a profit indicates that they needed additional labor for rice cultivation. However, it doesn't explicitly imply that planters couldn't make rice profitable on their own; it merely suggests they required additional workers for this specific crop.
C. The statement that planters had to be self-sufficient because plantations were far from the coast doesn't directly address the profitability of rice as a crop. It focuses on their need for self-sufficiency due to the distance from the coast, but it doesn't explain why they couldn't make rice profitable.
D. The evidence that planters relied on the farming skills brought by the enslaved Africans from the rice-growing areas of West Africa strongly supports the claim that planters couldn't make rice a profitable crop on their own. This option highlights the importance of expertise and knowledge transferred by enslaved Africans, indicating that the planters relied on them for successful rice cultivation.
Therefore, your answer, option D, is correct.