What effect did the eastern front have on World War I?
Select all that apply.
The Central powers surrendered to the Allied powers due to their losses to Russia on the eastern front.
The heavy Russian losses, combined with food and fuel shortages, led to the abdication of Czar Nicholas II.
The eastern front weakened Austro-Hungarian forces, making them less effective on the western front.
The eastern front ended within one year and did not have an important effect on the outcome of the war.
based on what i have read, i'm gonna go with A and D (the first one, and the last one)
While it is important to refer to the information you have read and make an informed decision, I would like to provide some additional context to help you determine the correct answers.
The Eastern Front had significant effects on World War I. Here's an explanation of each statement:
A) The Central powers surrendered to the Allied powers due to their losses to Russia on the Eastern Front: This statement is not entirely accurate. While the Eastern Front had a substantial impact on the Central Powers, it was not the sole reason for their surrender. The military losses on the Eastern Front did contribute to the weakening of the Central Powers, but it was not the decisive factor in their surrender. Therefore, this statement is not entirely correct.
B) The heavy Russian losses, combined with food and fuel shortages, led to the abdication of Czar Nicholas II: This statement is indeed accurate. Russia suffered heavy casualties on the Eastern Front, and these losses, along with economic hardships such as food and fuel shortages, contributed to the discontent of the Russian people and ultimately led to the abdication of Czar Nicholas II.
C) The Eastern Front weakened Austro-Hungarian forces, making them less effective on the Western Front: This statement is correct. The Eastern Front diverted resources, manpower, and attention from the Austro-Hungarian forces, significantly weakening them. This diversion of resources made them less effective on the Western Front and affected their overall military capability.
D) The Eastern Front ended within one year and did not have an important effect on the outcome of the war: This statement is not accurate. The Eastern Front lasted for the entire duration of World War I and had a profound impact on the outcome of the war. It greatly strained the resources and military capabilities of the Central Powers, as they had to fight on two fronts simultaneously. While the Western Front is often seen as the primary theater of the war, the Eastern Front played a significant role in the overall outcome.
Having explained each statement, the correct answers would be B and C. The heavy Russian losses and economic hardships contributed to the abdication of Czar Nicholas II, and the weakened Austro-Hungarian forces on the Eastern Front had an impact on their effectiveness on the Western Front.