In their book The Bell Curve, Murray and Herrnstein supported their claim of intelligence differences between races and attributable to.
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1320283705
The claim about intelligence differences between races presented in "The Bell Curve" by Murray and Herrnstein is a contentious and controversial topic. It's important to note that this claim is not widely accepted by the scientific community and has been heavily criticized for its methodology and potential social biases.
To understand how Murray and Herrnstein supported their claim, it's crucial to consider their research methods. In their book, they primarily relied on a large volume of data analysis from various studies and surveys, including national surveys of cognitive abilities and academic achievement tests. They argued that these data indicated a correlation between intelligence and certain social outcomes, such as income, educational achievement, and social status.
However, it's essential to highlight that causality is a complex issue when studying intelligence differences between races. The authors argued that both genetic and environmental factors play a role, but they placed more emphasis on genetic factors as the primary explanation. Nonetheless, many researchers have scrutinized Murray and Herrnstein's approach, stating that it oversimplifies the complexity of intelligence and the influence of the environment.
If you want to explore the criticisms, limitations, and counterarguments to the claims made in "The Bell Curve," it is recommended to read critical responses, academic articles, and books written by other researchers who have engaged with this topic. It's vital to obtain a balanced and comprehensive understanding by considering multiple perspectives and critically analyzing the evidence presented.