I [ran] around the track four times at the previous football game.
OR
I [have run] around the track four times at the previous football game?
The first is right.
"Have run" would be used for action that occurred in the past and is still occurring.
I have run around the track four times.
Since it's an action that took place in the past and does not continue into the present, use the first one, the simple past.
Based on the given sentence options:
1. "I ran around the track four times at the previous football game."
In this sentence, the verb "ran" is in the past tense. It indicates that the action of running around the track occurred in the past.
2. "I have run around the track four times at the previous football game."
In this sentence, the verb "have run" is in the present perfect tense. It indicates that the action of running around the track started in the past and continues up until the present or is connected to the present in some way.
To answer your question, both options are grammatically correct, but they convey slightly different meanings.
Option 1 suggests that the act of running around the track happened at a specific moment in the past during the previous football game. It implies that the action is complete and not ongoing.
Option 2 implies that running around the track happened at some point in the past during the previous football game, but it is also relevant or has some connection to the present. It suggests that there may be some ongoing significance or relevance attached to the action.
To choose between the two options, consider the intended meaning you want to convey. If you are simply describing a past action, Option 1 is more appropriate. If you want to emphasize the ongoing relevance or connection to the present, Option 2 is a better choice.