Contrast utilitarian and deontological approaches to a dilemma involving genetic engineering.
How would you like us to help you with this assignment?
utilitarian ethics
To contrast utilitarian and deontological approaches to a dilemma involving genetic engineering, let's first define each approach:
1. Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people. It prioritizes the consequences or outcomes of an action and weighs the benefits and harms it will bring to society as a whole. In the context of genetic engineering, a utilitarian approach would consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of genetic modifications, and prioritize the option that yields the greatest overall happiness or well-being for the majority.
2. Deontology: Deontology is an ethical theory that emphasizes following moral rules or duties. Unlike utilitarianism, deontology cares less about the consequences of an action and focuses more on the inherent nature of the action itself. It seeks to determine whether the action is morally right or wrong based on adhering to principles or rules. In the context of genetic engineering, a deontological approach would consider whether genetic modifications align with moral principles or ethical rules, regardless of the potential consequences.
Now, let's apply these approaches to a specific dilemma involving genetic engineering, such as enhancing human intelligence:
Utilitarian approach: A utilitarian would consider the overall happiness and well-being that enhancing human intelligence through genetic engineering might bring. They would evaluate the potential benefits, such as advancements in science, medicine, and technology, which could improve society as a whole. They would also assess the potential drawbacks, such as potential inequalities, discrimination, or unintended consequences. The utilitarian would weigh these factors and make a decision based on what maximizes overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people.
Deontological approach: A deontologist, on the other hand, would focus on whether enhancing human intelligence violates any moral principles or ethical rules. They would analyze whether it goes against principles such as autonomy, dignity, fairness, or the intrinsic value of human beings. If genetic engineering is perceived as violating these principles, a deontologist may argue against it, regardless of the potential benefits that might be achieved.
It's important to note that these ethical approaches may lead to different conclusions regarding genetic engineering dilemmas. Utilitarianism prioritizes overall consequences, seeking to maximize happiness or well-being, while deontology gives importance to moral principles or duties. Both approaches provide different frameworks for evaluating ethical decisions, and the choice of approach may depend on an individual's personal values, beliefs, or ethical perspectives.