What are the special challenges of criterion contamination and what would be the effects on employees and employers if these challenges are not addressed?
http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=criterion+contamination
When you answer this question, be sure to define "criterion contamination" before you address the question.
When you finish writing up your response, be sure to re-post if you want someone here to read it over for you and comment.
This site should help you answer this question.
http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Em-Exp/Employee-Evaluation-and-Performance-Appraisals.html
Thank you for the suggested sites, they were a tremendous help. I was able to understand what criterion defiecncy actually was and how the challenges would affect both the employee and employer if not addressed.
Criterion contamination refers to a situation where the criteria used to evaluate employee performance are influenced by factors that are unrelated to job performance. This could include personal prejudices, biases, stereotypes, or other external influences that unfairly impact the assessment of an employee's work.
The special challenges of criterion contamination can have several negative effects on both employees and employers. Here's how:
1. Unfair evaluation: Criterion contamination can lead to unfair evaluations as employees may be judged based on factors unrelated to their job performance. This can result in inaccurate assessments, leading to employee dissatisfaction.
2. Decreased motivation: When employees perceive that their performance evaluation is influenced by factors beyond their control, it can erode their motivation. If employees believe that their efforts will not be recognized or rewarded fairly, they may become less engaged and productive.
3. Diminished trust: If employees believe that their performance evaluations are tainted by bias or unfairness, it can erode trust in the feedback and appraisal processes. This can create a negative work environment and weaken the relationship between employees and employers.
4. High turnover rates: Criterion contamination can contribute to a high turnover rate as employees may seek opportunities where they feel their performance will be evaluated fairly. This can be costly for employers who have to invest time and resources to recruit and train new employees.
To address these challenges, employers can take several actions:
1. Establish clear performance criteria: Clearly defining and communicating the performance criteria that are relevant to the job is crucial. This helps ensure that evaluations are based on objective and job-related factors.
2. Train evaluators: Providing training to evaluators on potential biases and the importance of fair and objective assessments can help minimize criterion contamination. This can include educating evaluators about unconscious biases and promoting awareness to prevent their influence on performance appraisals.
3. Implement standardized evaluation processes: Using standardized evaluation processes and rating scales can help reduce subjective biases. This ensures that all employees are evaluated against the same criteria and that their assessments are consistent.
4. Encourage employee feedback: Inviting employees to provide feedback about the evaluation process can help identify any potential bias or unfairness. This creates an opportunity to address concerns and make necessary adjustments to ensure fairness.
By addressing criterion contamination, employers can promote a fair and objective evaluation process that boosts employee morale, fosters trust, and contributes to a more productive and engaged workforce.