Evidence must be interesting relevant or opinionated and inferred entertaining or sufficient for it to be considered effective in the supporting claim
For example, if a claim is that a certain brand of sneakers is the most comfortable on the market, the evidence could include customer reviews stating how the sneakers have helped relieve foot pain or improve performance during physical activity. This evidence is both relevant and interesting, as it directly relates to the claim being made and provides concrete examples of the sneakers' comfort level.
On the other hand, if the evidence is simply a list of technical specifications of the sneakers without any real-world examples or opinions, it may not be as effective in supporting the claim. While this information may be relevant, it may not be as engaging or convincing to the audience.
In summary, effective evidence should be both informative and engaging, providing enough support for the claim to be considered credible and convincing.