The 9/11 Commission Report was published on July 22, 2004, three years after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. The report was authored by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, or “9/11 Commission.”
They were an independent, bipartisan group created on November 27, 2002, when President George W. Bush signed congressional legislation mandating that they produce a report exploring what really happened on 9/11. The 9/11 Commission Report studied U.S. preparedness and responsiveness to the attacks and provided recommendations to guard against future threats. The 9/11 Commission began its first hearings in New York City in the spring of 2003 and presented its findings in a public report released on July 22, 2004.
Read a PDF of the report here.
Birth of the 9/11 Commission
On November 27, 2002, U.S. President George W. Bush signed into law congressional legislation authorizing federal funding for intelligence activities. The legislation also established the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States in order to (in Bush’s words) “examine and report on the facts and causes relating to the September 11th terrorist attacks.”
Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was Bush’s choice to head the commission, while Democratic congressional leaders chose former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell as vice-chairman. Less than a month later, however, both men resigned from the 9/11 Commission, citing potential conflicts of interest. Mitchell did not want to sever ties to his law firm, while Kissinger—whom many considered too close to many national and international leaders to be objective—did not wish to disclose the identities of clients of his consulting firm.
Did you know? In early 2008, after it was revealed that that the CIA had destroyed videotaped interrogations of Al Qaeda operatives, 9/11 Commission leaders Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton wrote in the New York Times that the commission had asked the CIA repeatedly for information of the kind that would have been obtained in such interrogations; they called the agency's failure to disclose the existence of the tapes "obstruction."
To replace Kissinger, Bush tapped former New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean, a Republican. Congressional Democrats chose former Representative Lee Hamilton, Democrat of Indiana, to replace Mitchell. The 10-member commission included five Democrats and five Republicans. It was given a budget of some $3 million and a total of 18 months, or until the end of May 2004, to complete a full report of the circumstances surrounding the events of 9/11 and provide a number of recommendations to guard against future attacks.
This is a modal window.Something went wrong while setting up a Google DAI stream.
How Decades of Instability Gave Rise to Al-Qaeda and the 9/11 Attacks
Progress of the 9/11 Commission
Organizations representing the families of the 9/11 victims had been instrumental in the establishment of the 9/11 Commission, and closely monitored its progress. In March 2003, the 9/11 Commission sought $11 million in additional federal funding to complete its task in the allotted time period. Kean requested the funds as part of a $75 billion supplemental spending bill that Bush had submitted in order to pay for war with Iraq. Later that month, the Bush administration agreed to up the commission’s budget by $9 million.
From March 31 to April 1, 2003, the 9/11 Commission held its first public hearing in the United States Customs House, located not far from the World Trade Center site in New York City. Survivors of the 9/11 attacks and relatives of victims delivered their heart-wren
Currency Yes: No: If no, then why?
Relevance Yes: X No: If no, then why?
Authority Yes: No: If no, then why?
Accuracy Yes: No: If no, then why?
Purpose Yes: No: If no, then why?
After evaluation, would this article be considered an acceptable and reliable source? Why or why not?
Currency: Yes, as the article discusses the publication of the 9/11 Commission Report in 2004, which is relevant to the topic at hand.
Relevance: Yes, as the article provides background information on the establishment and progress of the 9/11 Commission, which is relevant to understanding the context in which the report was developed.
Authority: Yes, as the information provided in the article is sourced from historical events related to the establishment and progress of the 9/11 Commission.
Accuracy: Yes, as the information provided in the article aligns with known historical facts about the establishment and progress of the 9/11 Commission.
Purpose: Yes, as the purpose of the article is to provide information about the 9/11 Commission and its report, which it does effectively.
Overall, this article would be considered an acceptable and reliable source for information on the 9/11 Commission and its report due to its currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose.