1.2 How will the employees perceive the CEO and the HR director after these two directors instructed the managers and employees not to speak about the bridge’s collapse? Explain your answer in the context of the directors’ reputations, and respect for the directors by the employees. (Refer: Chapter 9)
The employees are likely to perceive the CEO and HR director in a negative light after they instructed managers and employees not to speak about the bridge's collapse. This action goes against transparency and honesty, two key qualities that employees look for in their leaders. By trying to suppress information about the incident, the CEO and HR director may be seen as prioritizing their own interests over the well-being of the employees and the overall company. This could damage their reputations as trustworthy and ethical leaders in the eyes of the employees.
Additionally, by instructing employees not to speak about the incident, the CEO and HR director may also lose respect from the employees. Respect is earned through open communication, integrity, and fairness, all of which were compromised by their actions in this situation. Employees may feel that the directors are not looking out for their best interests and are more concerned with protecting the company's image. This lack of respect could lead to lower morale, decreased productivity, and potentially even higher turnover rates within the organization. Overall, the employees are likely to view the CEO and HR director in a negative light due to their handling of the situation.