how will the employees perceive the CEO and the HR director after these two directors instructed the managers and employees not to speak about the bridge's collapse? explain your answer in context of the directors reputations, and respect for the directors by the employees
The employees are likely to perceive the CEO and HR director negatively after being instructed not to speak about the bridge's collapse. This action may damage the directors' reputations as they are seen as trying to suppress information and control the narrative surrounding a significant event. Employees may feel that the directors are not being transparent or honest, which could lead to a loss of trust and respect for them.
Employees may also feel frustrated and restricted by the directive to not speak about the collapse, as they may want to discuss their concerns, fears, or experiences related to the incident. This could create a sense of a lack of empathy or understanding from the directors, further eroding the employees' respect for them.
Overall, the action of instructing managers and employees not to speak about the bridge's collapse is likely to have a negative impact on the perceptions of the CEO and HR director among the employees. It could damage their reputations and decrease the level of respect and trust that the employees have for them.