what type of fallacies typically occur in crossverse fictional debates?
state and explain them
1. Appeal to authority fallacy: This fallacy occurs when a character in a fictional debate asserts that their argument is valid because it is supported by a respected or authoritative figure within the fictional world. This does not necessarily mean that the argument is actually sound, as authority figures can also be wrong or biased.
2. Strawman fallacy: In a crossverse fictional debate, characters might misrepresent their opponent's arguments in order to make them easier to attack. This fallacy involves creating a distorted or exaggerated version of the opponent's argument and then attacking that version instead of the actual argument.
3. Ad hominem fallacy: Characters in a crossover fictional debate might resort to attacking their opponent's character or personal traits rather than addressing their arguments. This fallacy involves attempting to discredit an argument by attacking the person making it, rather than addressing the actual points being made.
4. Appeal to emotion fallacy: Characters might appeal to emotions such as fear, pity, or anger in order to sway the audience's opinion rather than presenting logical arguments. This fallacy involves manipulating emotions rather than relying on facts and reasoning to support an argument.
5. False dilemma fallacy: Characters in a crossover fictional debate might present a situation as having only two possible outcomes or choices when there are actually more options available. This fallacy involves oversimplifying a complex issue and ignoring the nuance and complexity of the situation.