Begin the discussion by responding to the following prompt:
In your post, discuss the following with your peers:
Identify the chosen building. Why do you think the architect chose a pyramid for the shape of the building?
How would you design this building as a prism? Justify.
How would the change in shape affect the construction of the building?
How would the change in shape affect the use of the building? Use the concept of volume in this post.
Then read two of your peers’ posts. Respond to two of your peers:
For each post, explain why the pyramid or prism is a better shape for the building.
How would you improve on the identified pyramid-shaped building?
How would you improve on the alternate prism-shaped building?
I chose to discuss the Louvre Pyramid in Paris, designed by architect I.M. Pei. I think the architect chose a pyramid for the shape of the building because of its iconic and timeless symbolism. Pyramids have been historically associated with strength, stability, and power, which could be seen as fitting for a museum that houses such significant and valuable art collections. Additionally, the pyramid shape of the Louvre serves as a modern contrast to the classical architecture of the surrounding buildings, creating a unique focal point.
If I were to design the Louvre Pyramid as a prism, I would probably have to consider the functionality and aesthetics of the building as well. A prism shape would offer more flexibility in terms of interior space planning and could potentially allow for more natural light to enter the building from various angles. However, a prism shape may not have the same visual impact as a pyramid, which serves as a striking architectural statement.
The change in shape from a pyramid to a prism would definitely affect the construction of the building. A prism shape would introduce more complex geometries and structural requirements, which could increase the cost and construction time of the building. Additionally, the change in shape would also impact the building's foundation and load-bearing capabilities.
In terms of volume, the change in shape from a pyramid to a prism would also affect the overall volume of the building. A prism would have more interior space compared to a pyramid, potentially allowing for more exhibition areas or storage space. However, the pyramid's design creates a grand and awe-inspiring interior space, which could enhance the visitor experience.
In conclusion, while both shapes have their merits, I believe the pyramid is a better shape for the Louvre because of its symbolic significance and visually striking appeal. To improve on the pyramid-shaped building, I would perhaps consider incorporating more sustainable features and technologies for energy efficiency. As for the prism-shaped building, I would focus on maximizing natural light and creating an efficient layout for the interior spaces.