How were the causes and effects of the constitutional monarchy system in England similar to and different from those of the absolute monarchy systems in France, Spain, and Russia?(1 point) Responses Both systems were a response to the need for centralized power, but constitutional monarchy limited the monarch's power Both systems were a response to the need for centralized power, but constitutional monarchy limited the monarch's power Constitutional monarchy was based on divine right, while absolute monarchy was based on social contract Constitutional monarchy was based on divine right, while absolute monarchy was based on social contract Absolute monarchies promoted individual rights, while constitutional monarchy did not Absolute monarchies promoted individual rights, while constitutional monarchy did not Both systems completely eliminated the power of the monarchy Both systems completely eliminated the power of the monarchy
In summary, the causes of both the constitutional monarchy system in England and the absolute monarchy systems in France, Spain, and Russia were similar in that they were responses to the need for centralized power. However, the effects were different in that constitutional monarchy limited the monarch's power, while absolute monarchy gave the monarch complete control. Additionally, constitutional monarchy was based on divine right, while absolute monarchy was based on social contract. Furthermore, absolute monarchies promoted individual rights, while constitutional monarchy did not.
