How did thinkers grapple with and justify the shortcomings of Enlightenment ideas when they were put into practice?
One way that thinkers grappled with and justified the shortcomings of Enlightenment ideas when they were put into practice was by acknowledging that the implementation of these ideas was complex and challenging in a world that was not always rational or just. They recognized that societal change could not happen overnight and that it would require ongoing effort and struggle.
Some thinkers also argued that the shortcomings of Enlightenment ideas were not inherent flaws in the ideas themselves, but rather were the result of human error or corruption. They believed that if people could fully embrace reason, science, and progress, then the ideals of the Enlightenment could be realized more fully.
Additionally, some thinkers emphasized the need for a balance between individual freedom and social responsibility in order to address the shortcomings of Enlightenment ideas. They recognized that too much focus on individual rights and autonomy could lead to social disintegration, and instead advocated for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between the individual and society.
Overall, thinkers grappled with the shortcomings of Enlightenment ideas by acknowledging the complexity of their implementation, recognizing the role of human agency in shaping outcomes, and advocating for a more nuanced and balanced approach to realizing the ideals of the Enlightenment in practice.