1. Given that several parties (stakeholders) are impacted by the illicit selling of expired medicines by Lebo and his colleagues, an ethical issue arise, especially, some parties gain from this arrangement while others are put at a disadvantage.
Required: with reference to the good for self and for others principle, discuss why the illicit selling of expired medicines by Lebo and colleagues can be considered unethical behaviour. your answer should clearly indicate the parties represented by the 'self' and the óther' as well as a discussion of the benefits and negative consequences that arise for each party
The good for self and for others principle is a foundational ethical concept that emphasizes the importance of considering the well-being of both oneself and others when making decisions. In the case of Lebo and his colleagues engaging in the illicit selling of expired medicines, it is evident that this behavior can be considered unethical when viewed through the lens of this principle.
Firstly, let us consider the parties represented by the 'self' in this scenario. Lebo and his colleagues, who are involved in the illegal sales of expired medicines, may be benefiting financially from this activity. They may be making profits by selling these expired medicines at a lower cost to unsuspecting customers, thereby maximizing their own gain. However, this benefit to themselves comes at a cost to others.
On the other hand, the parties represented by the 'others' in this situation include the unsuspecting customers who purchase these expired medicines without knowledge of their true nature. These customers may suffer negative consequences from consuming expired medicines, such as adverse health effects or ineffective treatment of their medical conditions. This can result in harm, both physically and financially, to those who trust that the medicines they are purchasing are safe and effective.
When considering the good for self and for others principle, it becomes evident that the illicit selling of expired medicines by Lebo and his colleagues prioritizes their own financial gain over the well-being of others. This behavior disregards the potential harm and consequences that may befall the unsuspecting customers who purchase these expired medicines. In this sense, the actions of Lebo and his colleagues can be considered unethical as they prioritize their own self-interests at the expense of others.
In conclusion, the illicit selling of expired medicines by Lebo and his colleagues can be seen as unethical behavior when analyzed through the good for self and for others principle. By prioritizing their own financial gain over the well-being of unsuspecting customers, they are engaging in actions that harm others and go against the fundamental ethical principle of considering the welfare of all parties involved.