2.1 according to john stewart mill ( utilitarian ethics), the ultimate goal of human beings is to pursue and find happiness. in fact, Mill is of the opinion that actions can be considered right to the extent that they 'promote hapiness'
required: discuss,in the context of the Greatest Happiness Principle, whether Isabel Edwards behaviour of impersonating doctor can be considered the 'the right thing to do' because it enhance her hapipiness as an individual
The question of whether Isabel Edwards' behavior of impersonating a doctor can be considered the "right thing to do" according to John Stewart Mill's utilitarian ethics depends on the consequences of her actions and whether they ultimately lead to the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.
According to Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle, actions are considered 'right' if they promote happiness. In this case, if Isabel Edwards' impersonation of a doctor leads to positive outcomes, such as saving lives or improving the health of her patients, then her actions could be considered morally right according to utilitarian ethics.
On the other hand, if Isabel's behavior leads to negative consequences, such as misinformation or harm to her patients, then her actions would not be in line with the Greatest Happiness Principle. It is important to consider the overall impact of her actions on the well-being of others and whether they contribute to the overall happiness of society.
Ultimately, whether Isabel Edwards' behavior can be considered the 'right thing to do' from a utilitarian perspective depends on the outcomes of her actions and whether they lead to the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.