An application of Whistleblowing in terms of the virtue theory,deontological ethics and utilitarian ethics
Whistleblowing, in the context of virtue ethics, focuses on the character and motivations of the whistleblower. In this approach, whistleblowers are seen as individuals who possess the virtue of courage, honesty, and integrity. They are praised for their moral courage in standing up for what is right, even in the face of potential risks to themselves. The act of whistleblowing is seen as a reflection of the whistleblower's strong moral character and commitment to doing what is morally right.
From a deontological ethics perspective, whistleblowing is viewed as a moral duty or obligation. According to this ethical theory, individuals have a duty to act in accordance with certain moral principles, regardless of the consequences. Whistleblowers are seen as fulfilling their duty to expose wrongdoing and hold wrongdoers accountable, even if it means going against institutional norms or risking their own well-being. In this sense, whistleblowing is seen as a morally justified action based on the duty to uphold ethical standards.
Utilitarian ethics, on the other hand, considers the consequences of whistleblowing in terms of maximizing overall happiness or well-being. In this approach, the ethicality of whistleblowing is evaluated based on whether it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Whistleblowers are seen as acting in the interest of promoting transparency, accountability, and justice, which can lead to positive outcomes for society as a whole. However, utilitarian ethics also considers the potential negative consequences of whistleblowing, such as harm to individuals or damage to reputations. Overall, whistleblowing is viewed as ethical if the benefits outweigh the harms and contribute to the overall well-being of society.