After analyzing the writer’s list of sources, which statement best explains why one source should probably be removed?%0D%0A%0D%0A(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0ASource 1 is not credible because it has an anonymous author.%0D%0ASource 1 is not credible because it has an anonymous author.%0D%0A%0D%0ASource 2 is not credible because there is no proof that Robert Teller is a criminology expert.%0D%0ASource 2 is not credible because there is no proof that Robert Teller is a criminology expert.%0D%0A%0D%0ASource 2 is not reputable because it is a blog where the author can publish whatever they want.%0D%0ASource 2 is not reputable because it is a blog where the author can publish whatever they want.%0D%0A%0D%0ASource 1 is too old because it was published over fifty years ago.
