Which statement best identifies how the decision in the United States v Eichmann case was a result of constitutional interpretation ? (1 point ) The Supreme Court followed the Constitution exactly and no interpretations were made in this case The Supreme Court reconsidered the language of the Fourteenth Amendment Flag buming is not explicitly stated under the First Amendment but was interpreted to be a form of expression in the US . Eichmann case. The Supreme Court used the Flag Protection Act to make a decision .
The statement that best identifies how the decision in the United States v Eichmann case was a result of constitutional interpretation is: "Flag burning is not explicitly stated under the First Amendment but was interpreted to be a form of expression in the US v. Eichmann case." This decision required the Supreme Court to interpret the First Amendment in a way that protected the right to freedom of expression, even in cases involving controversial acts like flag burning.
