Compare how you were taught history in high school and university in first and second
year. (10)
In high school, history was taught in a more structured and rote memorization format. We were required to memorize dates, events, and key figures, and regurgitate this information on exams and assignments. The focus was more on learning the facts and details of historical events, rather than critically analyzing them or considering their broader implications.
In university, particularly in the first and second year, the approach to teaching history is much more analytical and in-depth. There is a greater emphasis on understanding the historical context, examining different perspectives and interpretations of events, and engaging in critical thinking and discussion. Rather than simply memorizing facts, we are encouraged to think critically about why certain events occurred, how they have shaped the world today, and the impact they have had on various groups of people.
Furthermore, in university, there is more emphasis on primary sources, research skills, and writing. We are expected to read and analyze historical documents, conduct our own research, and formulate our own arguments based on evidence. Writing essays and research papers are common assignments, which require us to synthesize information, make connections between different sources, and present well-supported arguments.
Overall, the approach to teaching history in university is much more focused on developing critical thinking skills, analytical abilities, and the ability to conduct independent research. It encourages students to think beyond the surface-level facts and delve deeper into the complexities of historical events.