what influence did economic conditions have on the outcome of the Civil War?

I TOTALLY DON'T GET IT.
why does ECONOMIC CONDITIONS have to do with Civil War??

Also, the second question says that, did charles force civil war on parliament? list 2 columns, 1 yes, 1 no, give reasons,

i dun get this either, i mean, of course he forced the parliament, hes always dishonest in his dealings with everyone, he always wanted money, so, i cant think of more, and i cant think of the NO reasons, PLZ HELP!!

This article may help you.

http://www.historyguide.org/earlymod/lecture7c.html

http://british-empire.suite101.com/article.cfm/origins_of_the_english_civil_war

First the Scots, then the Irish, rebelled against the King who had to then respond,but he had no money. Parliament in the end, did not give money to Charles, but managed the funds through themselves, and in the end, those who controlled the purse strings, controlled who won.

hmm i read it so many times on my texbook. well charles himself started the war cuz he always wants money rite? but then the parliament wont give him any. and then becuz the grand remonstrance thingy, charles wasn't happy about it so he lead an army and invaded the house of commons, then the war started rite? so this is a political war? not a religious?

but still, i cant think of any reason why he DIDN'T force parliament to fight bak, to start the war. becuz hes just so obssesed wif money he lost himself? and then ppl hate charles? i dun GET IT.

In both cases, it's important to understand the historical context and motivations of the events to grasp the connection between economic conditions and the outcome of the Civil War, as well as Charles' role in forcing the war on Parliament.

1. Economic conditions and the outcome of the Civil War:
The Civil War in the United States occurred from 1861 to 1865 and was fought between the Northern states (Union) and the Southern states (Confederacy). Economic conditions played a significant role in shaping the outcome of the war. Here's how you can understand the connection:

a) Divide the question into two parts: Economic conditions before the war and during the war.
- Before the war: The Southern states relied heavily on agriculture, particularly cotton production. The region's economic dependence on slavery and cash crops created a stark contrast with the industrialized economy of the Northern states. This stark economic division fueled tensions over issues like tariffs, states' rights, and the expansion of slavery.

- During the war: The Southern states lacked the industrial infrastructure to support a prolonged war effort. They faced challenges in mobilizing troops, producing weapons, and sustaining their armies due to limited manufacturing capabilities. On the other hand, the Northern states had a more diversified industrial economy, which allowed them to produce and supply resources necessary for the war. The Union's superior economic resources contributed to their ultimate victory over the Confederacy.

2. Charles forcing the Civil War on Parliament:
To evaluate whether Charles I of England forced the Civil War on Parliament, it's essential to consider the following:

a) Arguments in favor of "yes":
- Charles's actions and policies. For example, he dissolved Parliament multiple times, ruled without its consent, and made decisions that angered Parliament, such as imposing taxes without its approval.
- His authoritarian manner and belief in the Divine Right of Kings. Charles' attempts to assert his absolute authority and dismiss Parliament's role in decision-making created tension.

b) Arguments in favor of "no":
- Parliament's initial resistance. Some could argue that Parliament's decisions, resistance, and tensions with the king also contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War.
- The role of other factors. There were other significant causes of the Civil War, such as religious and political disputes that did not solely depend on Charles' actions.

Consider using these points as a starting point for your two-column list. Remember to refer to historical sources, primary documents, and scholarly perspectives to gather a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.