When the judicial activism warranted by the supreme court

becomes excessive or unreasonable, it can undermine the separation of powers and undermine democracy. Judicial activism is necessary at times to protect individual rights and uphold the constitution, but it should be exercised with caution and within the limits set by the legislative and executive branches. When the supreme court's activism goes beyond its proper role and starts to make law or impose its own policy preferences, it can be seen as overstepping its bounds and interfering with the functioning of the other branches of government. This can lead to a lack of accountability and democratic legitimacy, as unelected judges are making decisions that affect the law and society as a whole. In these cases, it is important for the court to respect its role as an arbiter of the law and not a creator of it, in order to maintain the balance of power and uphold the principles of democracy.