Jury's verdict: Tell how the jury finds in the
civil or criminal case and justify the verdict.
How was the burden of proof met or not
met? wiht the 3 little pigs
In the case of the three little pigs seeking damages for the destruction of their homes by the big bad wolf, the jury finds in favor of the three little pigs. The burden of proof was met by the pigs, as they presented compelling evidence showing that the wolf intentionally blew down each of their houses.
The pigs provided eyewitness testimony from the third pig who saw the wolf blow down his house, as well as physical evidence in the form of the straw, sticks, and bricks that were left behind. The pigs also presented expert testimony from a construction engineer who confirmed that the houses were indeed blown down by an external force.
Additionally, the pigs were able to demonstrate that the wolf had a history of destructive behavior towards other animals in the community, further supporting their claim that the wolf intentionally destroyed their homes.
Based on this evidence, the jury found that the burden of proof was met and ruled in favor of the three little pigs. They awarded the pigs damages for the destruction of their homes and issued a restraining order against the wolf to prevent any further harm to the community.