Use the graph to answer the question.
Which of the following best explains the difference between Tennessee and Mississippi on this graph?
(1 point)
Responses
Mississippi had more battles because it was on the coast.
Mississippi had more battles because it was on the coast.
Mississippi had fewer battles because it was on the Mississippi River.
Mississippi had fewer battles because it was on the Mississippi River.
Tennessee had many more battles because it was closer to Union territory.
Tennessee had many more battles because it was closer to Union territory.
Tennessee had many more battles because it remained part of the Union.
Tennessee had many more battles because it remained part of the Union.
The Free-Soil Party was a precursor to which political party?
(1 point)
Responses
Know Nothing Party
Know Nothing Party
Whig Party
Whig Party
Republican Party
Republican Party
Copperhead Party
Republican Party
Which of the following led to some Northerners labeling John Brown as a martyr?
(1 point)
Responses
Brown's appearance of being insane and the failure of his raid
Brown's appearance of being insane and the failure of his raid
Brown's acceptance of giving up his life for his beliefs
Brown's acceptance of giving up his life for his beliefs
Brown's desire to organize and carry out a slave revolt
Brown's desire to organize and carry out a slave revolt
Brown's persistence when fighting back against Southern troops
Brown's acceptance of giving up his life for his beliefs
After the Dred Scott decision, Frederick Douglass said he sought to have Americans live up to the principles of the Constitution. What did he believe prevented Americans from living up to the Constitution?
(1 point)
Responses
manifest destiny
manifest destiny
abolition
abolition
popular sovereignty
popular sovereignty
slavery
slavery
Use the image to answer the question.
Based on the illustration showing freed people with Union Army soldiers, what assumption is the artist making about the effects of the Emancipation Proclamation?
(1 point)
Responses
Former slaves would fight for the Union Army against the South.
Former slaves would fight for the Union Army against the South.
Former slaves would welcome the arrival of the Union army.
Former slaves would welcome the arrival of the Union army.
Former slaves would not be allowed to live in the North.
Former slaves would not be allowed to live in the North.
Former slaves would continue to be enslaved in the North.
Former slaves would continue to be enslaved in the North.
Former slaves would fight for the Union Army against the South.
How did Americans disagree over the role of federal and state governments before and during the Civil War?
(4 points)
Before and during the Civil War, Americans disagreed over the role of federal and state governments in various ways:
1. **States' Rights**: One of the main points of disagreement was the extent of states' rights versus federal authority. Southern states believed in the principle of states' rights, arguing that states should have the right to make their own laws without interference from the federal government. This was a key factor leading to secession and the formation of the Confederacy.
2. **Federal Power**: On the other hand, many in the North, particularly Republicans, believed in a stronger federal government and that the Constitution granted the federal government the power to preserve the Union and end slavery. This was a key point of contention leading up to the Civil War and continued to be a source of conflict during the war.
3. **Tariffs and Economic Policies**: Disagreements over economic policies, such as tariffs and internal improvements, also played a role in the debate over federal versus state authority. The South, which relied heavily on agriculture and trade, opposed high tariffs that benefited Northern industry. These economic differences also tied into broader debates over federal power.
4. **Slavery**: The issue of slavery was closely tied to the debate over federal and state powers before and during the Civil War. While many in the South believed in states' rights to determine their own slave laws, anti-slavery advocates in the North argued that the federal government should have the power to regulate or end slavery.
Overall, these disagreements over the role of federal and state governments contributed to the growing sectional tensions that eventually led to the Civil War.
in different words
Before and during the Civil War, Americans had differing opinions on the balance of power between the federal government and state governments. Some believed in the principle of states' rights, advocating for states to have more authority to govern themselves without interference from the federal government. This perspective was particularly strong in the South and contributed to the Southern states' secession and formation of the Confederacy.
On the other hand, there were those, mainly in the North and among Republicans, who supported a stronger federal government. They believed that the Constitution granted the federal government the power to maintain the Union and address issues such as slavery. This difference in views on federal versus state authority was a significant source of conflict that ultimately led to the Civil War.
Additional points of contention related to economic policies, such as tariffs and internal improvements, which were tied to debates over federal power. Differences in opinion over slavery further fueled the disagreements, with some advocating for states' rights to determine their own slave laws and others pushing for federal action to address or abolish slavery.
In summary, the disagreements over the roles of federal and state governments were central to the growing tensions between the North and South and played a significant role in the lead-up to the Civil War.
in different words plesaes
Certainly! Before and during the Civil War, there were disagreements among Americans regarding the extent of power that should be held by the federal government as opposed to the state governments. Some people argued in favor of states having more autonomy in making decisions and laws without interference from the federal government. This belief in states' rights, particularly strong in the Southern states, played a role in the secession of those states and the formation of the Confederacy.
Conversely, others, especially in the North and within the Republican Party, supported a stronger role for the federal government. They believed that the Constitution granted the federal government the authority to preserve the Union and address issues like slavery. This difference in perspective on federal versus state authority was a significant point of contention that contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War.
Discord over economic policies, such as tariffs and internal improvements, was also linked to debates over the extent of federal power. Disagreements related to slavery further heightened tensions, with some advocating for states to have the ability to determine their own policies on slavery, while others argued for federal intervention to address or abolish slavery.
In essence, the disagreements over the division of powers between the federal government and state governments were central to the mounting divisions between the North and South, which eventually culminated in the outbreak of the Civil War.
in words that sound like a human not AI please
Certainly! Before and during the Civil War, Americans had different opinions about how much power the federal government should have compared to the state governments. Some thought states should have more control over their own laws and decisions without the federal government getting involved too much. This idea, known as states' rights, was especially important in the South and led to the Southern states breaking away to form the Confederacy.
Others, especially in the North and the Republican Party, believed that the federal government should have more authority. They thought that the Constitution allowed the federal government to keep the country together and deal with important issues like slavery. This disagreement about how much power the federal government should have caused a lot of tension and eventually helped start the Civil War.
People also argued about economic issues like taxes and building projects, which were connected to the larger debate about federal authority. Disagreements about slavery also fueled the conflict, with some wanting each state to decide its own rules about slavery, while others felt the federal government should step in to address or end slavery.
In simple terms, the disagreements over the roles of the federal and state governments were a major factor in the growing divide between the North and South that ultimately led to the Civil War.