You will be creating a court case around a children’s story or fairy tale. For example, in Goldilocks and Three Bears Goldilocks could be charged with breaking and entering.

Name of the children's story or fairy tale upon which your trial will be based. Who are the major characters? What was the incident that will go to trial?

Title: Cinderella

Major Characters:
- Cinderella
- Fairy Godmother
- Evil Stepmother
- Stepsisters
- Prince Charming

Incident: The trial will focus on Cinderella being accused of theft for stealing her stepsisters' invitation to the royal ball. The stepsisters claim that Cinderella stole the invitation in order to attend the ball herself and steal the prince's heart. Witnesses will include the Fairy Godmother, who provided Cinderella with a gown and carriage for the ball, as well as Prince Charming, who will testify as to Cinderella's innocence and her true identity as the mysterious maiden he fell in love with at the ball. The trial will also bring to light the abuse and mistreatment Cinderella suffered at the hands of her stepfamily, shedding light on the true nature of their accusations.

Type of case - Civil or Criminal? Explain which and why

In this scenario, the type of case would likely be a civil case. The accusation of theft of the invitation to the royal ball by Cinderella would typically fall under the realm of a civil case, as it involves a dispute between individuals (Cinderella and her stepsisters) rather than a violation of criminal law. The main issue at hand is a disagreement over property rights, rather than a clear violation of criminal statutes.

Additionally, the motives behind the accusation - jealousy, spite, and mistreatment of Cinderella by her stepfamily - suggest that the case is more about interpersonal conflicts and family dynamics, rather than a serious criminal offense. The focus of the trial would be on resolving the dispute and determining the truth of the matter, rather than imposing criminal punishments on Cinderella.

Therefore, a civil case would be more suited to address the accusations made against Cinderella regarding the theft of the royal ball invitation in this fairy tale scenario.

Make it shorter

The type of case would likely be a civil case because the accusation of theft of the royal ball invitation is a dispute between individuals, rather than a clear violation of criminal law. The focus would be on resolving the dispute and determining the truth of the matter, rather than imposing criminal punishment on Cinderella.

Evidence that the plaintiff or prosecuting attorney will introduce, including witnesses:

1. The stepsisters would present the stolen invitation as evidence, claiming that Cinderella took it without permission.

2. The Fairy Godmother would testify on behalf of Cinderella, explaining how she transformed her for the ball and did not witness any theft.
3. Prince Charming would provide his account of meeting Cinderella at the ball and attest to her innocence and good character.
4. Evidence of the mistreatment and abuse Cinderella endured from her stepfamily would be presented to show possible motives for the false accusation. This could include testimonials from other characters who have witnessed the mistreatment.

Evidence that the defense attorney will introduce, including witnesses:

1. Cinderella herself would testify, maintaining her innocence and providing her version of events regarding the invitation.

2. The Fairy Godmother would provide her testimony, corroborating Cinderella's account and emphasizing her good intentions and innocence.
3. Other witnesses, such as mice or birds from the story, could potentially testify to Cinderella's good character and relationship with animals.
4. Evidence of Cinderella's mistreatment and abuse at the hands of her stepfamily would be presented to establish a possible motive for the stepsisters' false accusation against her. This could include testimonials and accounts from other characters who have witnessed the mistreatment.

Jury's verdict: Tell how the jury finds in the civil or criminal case and justify the verdict. How was the burden of proof met or not met?