In 3–5 sentences, compare the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia please make it short
The constitutional monarchy in England was the result of a gradual shift of power from the monarch to a representative parliament, culminating in the Magna Carta in 1215. This system ensured that the monarch's powers were limited by a set of laws and regulations. In contrast, absolute monarchy in Russia was established by Peter the Great and upheld by subsequent rulers, concentrating power in the hands of the monarch without any checks or balances. The effects of constitutional monarchy in England included increased stability, protection of individual rights, and a foundation for modern democracy, while absolute monarchy in Russia led to widespread oppression, lack of civil liberties, and eventual revolution.
