In 3-5 sentences, compare the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia
The causes of constitutional monarchy in England stemmed from the Magna Carta signed in 1215, which limited the power of the monarch and paved the way for a system of checks and balances. This led to the establishment of a constitutional monarchy where the monarch's powers were significantly constrained by a constitution and parliament. The effects of this system included greater political stability, the protection of individual rights, and the development of democratic principles.
In contrast, the causes of absolute monarchy in Russia were largely driven by the desire for centralized power and control, as well as a lack of democratic institutions. This led to the establishment of an absolute monarchy where the monarch had unchecked power and authority over all aspects of government. The effects of absolute monarchy in Russia included widespread corruption, oppression of the peasantry, and resistance to modernization and reform.
Overall, the key difference between constitutional monarchy in England and absolute monarchy in Russia was the level of power and authority held by the monarch. While constitutional monarchy in England resulted in a more balanced and stable government, absolute monarchy in Russia led to widespread abuses of power and a lack of accountability.