Discuss among the early school of psychology on the argument of biology and enviroment approach and its impact on individual behavoir (nature vs nurture) with breif example.
The early school of psychology was divided on the argument of biology and environment in shaping individual behavior, commonly known as the nature vs. nurture debate. Some psychologists believed that biology played a significant role in determining behavior, while others argued that the environment and experiences were more influential.
One example of the biology approach is seen in the work of early behaviorists such as B.F. Skinner, who believed that behavior was largely determined by genetics and biological factors. He conducted experiments on animals to demonstrate how behavior could be shaped through reinforcement and punishment, emphasizing the role of innate tendencies in shaping behavior.
On the other hand, proponents of the environmental approach, such as John B. Watson, believed that behavior was primarily determined by external factors and experiences. They argued that behavior could be conditioned and shaped through learning and environmental influences, such as parenting styles and societal norms.
The impact of the nature vs. nurture debate on individual behavior is significant, as it has implications for various aspects of psychology, including clinical practice, education, and policy-making. Understanding the interplay between biology and environment can help psychologists tailor interventions to better meet the needs of individuals and promote positive outcomes.
Overall, the nature vs. nurture debate continues to be a relevant and ongoing discussion in psychology, as researchers seek to better understand the complex interactions between biology and environment in shaping individual behavior.