Why is the salt march considered a failure by Indians?
The Salt March, also known as the Dandi March, was a nonviolent protest led by Mahatma Gandhi in 1930 against the British salt monopoly in India. While the march itself was successful in drawing international attention to the Indian independence movement and inspiring mass civil disobedience against British rule, it is considered a failure by some Indians due to its limited impact on achieving independence from British colonial rule.
Despite the widespread participation in the Salt March and other civil disobedience campaigns that followed, including the historic Quit India Movement in 1942, India did not gain independence until 1947. Many Indians believe that the Salt March and other nonviolent protests were not enough to pressure the British government to grant independence to India, and that it was ultimately achieved through a combination of factors including World War II and the changing political landscape in Britain.
Additionally, some critics argue that the Salt March did not effectively address the economic and social inequalities faced by many Indians, particularly those in rural areas. While it was successful in mobilizing the masses and highlighting the injustices of British colonial rule, it did not lead to significant immediate improvements in the lives of ordinary Indians.
Overall, while the Salt March is recognized as a significant moment in India's struggle for independence and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance, some Indians view it as a partial success due to its limited impact in achieving independence and addressing broader social and economic issues.