Analyzing Informational Text Portfolio Unit 7 Lesson 9
1. Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts.
2. Write a paragraph in which you explain why it matters when the two authors interpret the same facts differently. Using specific examples from the two texts, describe the impact of the authors' differing interpretations of the facts on you as a reader.
3. Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including a conflicting point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples.
make me a new one plzz
Analyzing Informational Text Portfolio Unit 7 Lesson 9
1. Experienced readers can use several steps to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. First, they should carefully read and compare the texts, noting any differences in facts, evidence, or reasoning. They can then identify any biases or assumptions present in each text and consider how these may influence the presentation of information. Next, readers should evaluate the credibility and expertise of the authors, examining their qualifications and affiliations to determine their potential biases. It is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information because it allows them to form a more balanced and informed perspective on a topic. For example, in Text A, the author presents evidence from a scientific study indicating that consuming dairy is harmful to one's health. However, in Text B, the author argues that dairy is an essential part of a balanced diet. By recognizing and evaluating the conflicting information, readers can critically analyze both perspectives and come to their own conclusions based on the available evidence.
2. When two authors interpret the same facts differently, it matters because it can greatly impact the reader's understanding and perspective on a topic. For instance, in Text A, the author interprets the increase in greenhouse gas emissions as a consequence of human activities, emphasizing the urgent need for environmental regulations. On the other hand, in Text B, the author interprets the same facts as natural climate fluctuations, downplaying the need for immediate action. As a reader, these differing interpretations can create confusion and uncertainty, making it challenging to form a clear and informed opinion. The impact of the authors' differing interpretations of the facts can result in readers questioning the credibility of the information presented and ultimately struggling to make an informed decision or take action.
3. Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive because it demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the topic and addresses counterarguments. When an argument acknowledges opposing viewpoints and presents evidence that contradicts the main claim, it shows readers that the author has taken a balanced and unbiased approach. This inclusion of conflicting perspectives strengthens the argument by preemptively addressing potential skepticism and showing the author's willingness to engage in a fair and objective discussion. For example, in Text A, the author provides arguments against the use of social media, such as its negative impact on mental health. However, the author also includes evidence from studies highlighting the potential benefits of social media, such as fostering communication and connection. By incorporating conflicting points of view and evidence, the author acknowledges a broader perspective and further persuades readers by demonstrating a comprehensive and reasoned analysis of the topic.