How were the causes and effects of the constitutional monarchy system in England similar to and different from those of the absolute monarchy systems in France, Spain, and Russia?
Constitutional monarchy was based on divine right, while absolute monarchy was based on social contract
Constitutional monarchy was based on divine right, while absolute monarchy was based on social contract
Absolute monarchies promoted individual rights, while constitutional monarchy did not
Absolute monarchies promoted individual rights, while constitutional monarchy did not
Both systems were a response to the need for centralized power, but constitutional monarchy limited the monarch's power
Both systems were a response to the need for centralized power, but constitutional monarchy limited the monarch's power
Both systems completely eliminated the power of the monarchy
Both systems completely eliminated the power of the monarchy
One similarity between the causes and effects of the constitutional monarchy system in England and the absolute monarchies in France, Spain, and Russia is that they were all responses to the need for centralized power. In all these countries, there was a desire for a strong central authority that could effectively govern and maintain stability.
However, there are also some differences between the two systems. In the case of constitutional monarchy in England, the system was based on the belief in divine right, where the monarch's power was believed to be granted by God. On the other hand, the absolute monarchy systems in France, Spain, and Russia were based on the concept of social contract, where the monarch's power was derived from the consent and will of the people.
Another difference is that absolute monarchies promoted individual rights, while constitutional monarchy generally did not. In countries like France, Spain, and Russia, absolute monarchs had the authority to make decisions and enforce their rule without limitations, which could have positive or negative effects on individual rights. In contrast, constitutional monarchy in England limited the power of the monarch through the establishment of a constitution and the presence of a parliamentary system, which provided some checks and balances to protect individual rights and prevent the abuse of power.
Lastly, while constitutional monarchy limited the power of the monarchy, absolute monarchy systems completely eliminated the power of the monarchy. In countries like France, Spain, and Russia, the absolute monarchs held complete control over the government and the people, making decisions without any limitations from a constitution or parliamentary system. In England, even though the monarch's power was limited, they still retained some authority within the framework of the constitutional monarchy system.