How does the interaction of environment and culture differ between North Kivu and Gatlinburg?(1 point) Responses The lack of valuable natural resources in North Kivu has created poverty. The wealth of natural resources in Gatlinburg has benefited the society. The lack of valuable natural resources in North Kivu has created poverty. The wealth of natural resources in Gatlinburg has benefited the society. In Gatlinburg, the culture has benefited from the environment. In North Kivu, the natural environment has contributed to a culture of violence and corruption. In Gatlinburg, the culture has benefited from the environment. In North Kivu, the natural environment has contributed to a culture of violence and corruption. Gatlinburg’s culture is a result of overcoming the natural environment. North Kivu’s culture has been damaged by the natural environment. Gatlinburg’s culture is a result of overcoming the natural environment. North Kivu’s culture has been damaged by the natural environment. In Gatlinburg, culture is based on acquiring valuable minerals. In North Kivu, the valuable minerals are being taken away from the region.
In North Kivu, the interaction of environment and culture is characterized by the lack of valuable natural resources, leading to poverty and the region being exploited for its minerals. This has contributed to a culture of violence and corruption.
On the other hand, in Gatlinburg, the wealth of natural resources has benefited the society. The culture in Gatlinburg is a result of overcoming the challenges posed by the natural environment and acquiring valuable minerals. There is no mention of violence or corruption in the description of Gatlinburg's culture.
Therefore, the key difference between the interaction of environment and culture between North Kivu and Gatlinburg is that in North Kivu, the natural environment has contributed to a culture of violence and corruption, while in Gatlinburg, the culture has benefited from the environment and the acquisition of valuable minerals.