How does the interaction of environment and culture differ between North Kivu and Gatlinburg?(1 point)
Responses
In Gatlinburg, the culture has benefited from the environment. In North Kivu, the natural environment has contributed to a culture of violence and corruption.
In Gatlinburg, the culture has benefited from the environment. In North Kivu, the natural environment has contributed to a culture of violence and corruption.
Gatlinburg’s culture is a result of overcoming the natural environment. North Kivu’s culture has been damaged by the natural environment.
Gatlinburg’s culture is a result of overcoming the natural environment. North Kivu’s culture has been damaged by the natural environment.
The lack of valuable natural resources in North Kivu has created poverty. The wealth of natural resources in Gatlinburg has benefited the society.
The lack of valuable natural resources in North Kivu has created poverty. The wealth of natural resources in Gatlinburg has benefited the society.
In Gatlinburg, culture is based on acquiring valuable minerals. In North Kivu, the valuable minerals are being taken away from the region.
In Gatlinburg, culture is based on tourism and the natural beauty of the area. In North Kivu, the valuable minerals are being exploited by external entities, leading to conflict and instability in the region.
Which of the following best connects an example of cultural change in a place to trade patterns within it?(1 point)
Responses
A. People are buying fewer warm clothes in Kiribati.
B. Fewer people find jobs as petroleum workers in Texas because of depleted reserves.
C. In India beef is not sold in grocery stores.
D. Grocery stores in some parts of India are beginning to sell beef.
D. Grocery stores in some parts of India are beginning to sell beef.
Which of the following best connects patterns of Indigenous American land use with culture before the arrival of Europeans?(1 point)
Responses