Analyze the language used in two court cases that involves the Third Amendment. wright down the court case and year that it took place in and explain how the legal language has evolved in addressing modern challenges relating to quarantine of soldiers. one sentence
1) Engblom v. Carey (1982): The court case addressed the applicability of the Third Amendment in a situation where National Guard troops were temporarily housed in a private property during a strike, and the language used focused on the historical context and interpretation of the amendment.
2) Castorina v. Madison County (2017): This court case involved a claim that a local government violated the Third Amendment by requiring a homeowner to provide housing for law enforcement officers during an investigation, showing how the legal language has adapted to modern challenges and expanded the understanding of "soldiers" to include law enforcement personnel in certain circumstances.